You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Michael Corn on August 9, 2012 - 12:15pm.

If Market Leader is not providing brokerage services, how are they getting access to IDX without being an 'Active Participant'. This is a clear violation of of the change put forth by NAR a year ago that prohibited this kind of activity!

"Mere possession of a broker’s license is not sufficient to qualify for MLS participation. Rather, the requirement that an individual or firm ‘offers or accepts cooperation and compensation’ means that the Participant actively endeavors during the operation of its real estate business to list real property of the type listed on the MLS and/or to accept offers of cooperation and compensation made by listing brokers or agents in the MLS. “Actively” means on a continual and on-going basis during the operation of the Participant’s real estate business."

 
Submitted by Craig Cheatham on August 10, 2012 - 1:00pm.

If this story is accurate, MLSs should stop this feed for improper use of data immediately. The Realty Alliance will be notifying its members of this program so our member firms can ensure their MLSs take action.

 
Submitted by Matt Carter on August 10, 2012 - 1:34pm.

Brian Boero of 1000Watt consulting says that with its RealEstate.com play, Market Leader is, "raising a giant middle finger to MLSs, the spirit of IDX and, most significantly, to operating brokers."

 

 
Submitted by Timothy Brookbanks on August 13, 2012 - 8:51am.

Sigh, grey areas seem to have become the loophole norm. There are many people who are unhappy about this, but will their unhappiness cause change?

We are all about honesty and leveling the playing field - hence our group buying service. We unite prospective condo buyers in order to gain leverage during developer negotiations - the end result is a better price as well as selection for all of the people in the group. It is a free service and there is no obligation to buy :)

 
Submitted by Don Stewart on August 13, 2012 - 1:55pm.

When will we stop the madness?

How is it fair for hard working agents to gather the listing data, and pay to post it on MLS so these lead farms can aggregate the listings on their own website, attract prospective buyers and sellers (with your listings), and sell access to the people they attract to any agent that will pay them.

Does any of this seem fair to you?

Is it just me or is this whole thing completely upside down?

 
Submitted by Mike Bowler Sr. on August 13, 2012 - 2:05pm.

How does this differ from the "Franchise Rule" When Market Leader put contracts together with MLS's did the disclose realestate.com?

“Expect the Best” Mike

 
Submitted by Roberta Murphy on August 13, 2012 - 2:38pm.

Beware: RealEstate.com once operated as a brokerage here in San Diego. They might do so again, but imagine they make more money selling sidebars to agents.