Missy Caulk

• Michigan Realtors, Lenders, Stagers

• Manage |RSSReal Estate Bloggers
• Manage |RSSReal Estate Brokerage of the Future
• Manage |RSSReal Estate Legal Discussion
• Manage |RSSReal Estate Marketing 2.0
• Manage |RSSThe Great MLS Debate --

Thank you!! A fun way to not worry about my bounce rate. Missy Caulk Ann Arbor, MI Missy@MissyCaulk.com www.AnnArborRealEstateTalk.com www.SearchAnnArborHouses.com

Thanks Jay, then NO I would not agree with it. Looking at who they supported over the last few years... I am not a one issue voter, and there are other issues that I support that in many ways are far more important than real estate related issues. Missy Caulk Ann Arbor, MI Missy@MissyCaulk.com www.AnnArborRealEstateTalk.com www.SearchAnnArborHouses.com

I totally support NAR and what it does for our industry. Each year I donate to RPAC II, as it goes for issues that are important for our industry. I do not donate to RPAC the main fund because I don't always agree with the candidates they endorse. There are other issues of importance to me as well as the housing industry. The $40.00 a year in not that big of deal, but I am sure it is too many of our Realtors. Look NAR didn't change the level playing field, the Supreme Court did with Citizens Choice. Agree or not agree it is the current law of the land, and we must be a voice for our industry. As long as it goes towards issues that effect private property rights and not candidates I am OK with the increase. After all NAR has not increased the dues for a few years. It will be interesting how this issue turns out, I suspect it will all be in the presentation. Missy Caulk Ann Arbor, MI Missy@MissyCaulk.com www.AnnArborRealEstateTalk.com www.SearchAnnArborHouses.com